AFFF lawsuit claims continue to grow in 2026 as thousands of firefighters, military personnel, and nearby residents seek justice. Aqueous film-forming foam (AFFF) contained toxic PFAS chemicals. These “forever chemicals” contaminated drinking water supplies across the country. The litigation is one of the largest mass torts in U.S. history.
Over 15,000 personal injury cases are now pending in federal court. If you were exposed to AFFF and developed cancer or other serious health conditions, you may qualify to file a claim. However, time limits apply in every state. Consulting a licensed attorney is the best first step.
Case Timeline
Last checked: May 16, 2026
What Is the AFFF Lawsuit About?
AFFF is a specialized firefighting foam used since the 1960s to extinguish fuel-based fires. The U.S. military required its use at bases and training facilities for decades. Municipal fire departments and airports also relied on it heavily. The foam contained per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances, commonly known as PFAS. These chemicals do not break down in the environment. As a result, they earned the nickname “forever chemicals.”
Manufacturers like 3M, DuPont, Chemours, Tyco Fire Products, and others knew about the risks. Internal documents suggest these companies understood PFAS could harm human health. However, they continued selling AFFF without adequate warnings. The chemicals seeped into groundwater near military bases, airports, and fire training sites. Communities that relied on those water sources were unknowingly exposed for years.
The AFFF lawsuit alleges this exposure caused serious medical conditions. Kidney cancer, testicular cancer, thyroid cancer, and liver cancer are among the primary claims. Thyroid disease and ulcerative colitis are also recognized injuries. In most cases, plaintiffs were exposed through contaminated drinking water or direct occupational contact with the foam. The damage was widespread and often went undetected for decades.
MDL Case Status and Key Facts
| Detail | Information |
|---|---|
| MDL Number | 2873 |
| Official Case Name | In re: Aqueous Film-Forming Foams Products Liability Litigation |
| Presiding Judge | Hon. Richard M. Gergel |
| Federal District | U.S. District Court, District of South Carolina (Charleston) |
| Pending Cases (April 2026) | Approximately 15,222 personal injury claims |
| Bellwether Trial Status | No trial date currently set; original October 2025 date postponed |
| Water System Settlements | Over $14 billion approved across multiple defendants |
The first personal injury bellwether trial was scheduled for October 2025. It focused on kidney cancer claims. However, Judge Gergel pulled the trial from the calendar. A surge in new filings required additional quality control on medical records and exposure documentation. The court held a Science Day in June 2025. Experts presented evidence on thyroid and liver cancer causation. A new bellwether schedule is expected later in 2026.
For example, a special master is now working with attorneys on both sides. This signals that the court considers the AFFF lawsuit mature enough for serious settlement talks. Meanwhile, the EPA finalized PFAS drinking water standards in April 2024. Maximum contaminant levels for PFOA and PFOS were set at 4 parts per trillion. The agency designated these chemicals as hazardous substances under federal Superfund law. These regulatory actions strengthen the legal foundation for every AFFF lawsuit claim.
Who Qualifies for the AFFF Lawsuit?
Eligibility for the AFFF lawsuit depends on two main factors: exposure and diagnosis. You must show that you had significant contact with AFFF or PFAS-contaminated water. You must also have a qualifying medical condition. The court’s Case Management Order 33 identifies six primary diagnoses. These are kidney cancer, testicular cancer, thyroid cancer, liver cancer, thyroid disease, and ulcerative colitis.
Typically, the strongest claims come from military firefighters and civilian firefighters. Personnel stationed at military bases where AFFF was used in training exercises also qualify. Residents who lived near these facilities and drank contaminated water may be eligible as well. Airport workers and industrial employees who handled AFFF are included. In most cases, exposure must have occurred over a meaningful period of time.
Evidence plays a critical role. Medical records confirming your diagnosis are essential. Military service records, employment history, or proof of residence near a contaminated site help establish exposure. Blood tests showing elevated PFAS levels can further strengthen a claim. However, not every case requires blood testing. A licensed attorney experienced in AFFF litigation can evaluate your specific situation and advise on next steps.
How to File an AFFF Lawsuit Claim
The first step is contacting a mass tort attorney who handles AFFF cases. Most firms offer free case evaluations. They work on a contingency fee basis. This means you pay nothing upfront. The attorney will review your medical history, exposure timeline, and potential damages. If your case qualifies, the firm will file your complaint in MDL-2873 in the District of South Carolina.
After filing, you will need to complete a Plaintiff Fact Sheet. This document provides details about your exposure, medical treatment, and personal background. It is a required step in the MDL process. Your attorney will help you gather the necessary documentation. For example, military service records can be obtained through the National Personnel Records Center. Medical records should cover your full treatment history for the qualifying condition.
The statute of limitations varies by state. Most states allow two to three years from the date of diagnosis or discovery. Nearly every state follows a “discovery rule” for toxic exposure cases. The clock typically does not start until you knew or should have known your illness was linked to AFFF exposure. However, 2026 is not too late to file for many claimants. The window is narrowing. Acting promptly protects your legal rights and ensures you do not miss critical filing deadlines.
📨 Get Free Mass Tort Guides Alerts
Free · No spam · Unsubscribe anytime
Settlement Updates and What to Expect
No global personal injury settlement exists as of May 2026. However, water contamination settlements have exceeded $14 billion. 3M agreed to pay between $10.5 and $12.5 billion over 13 years. That settlement received final court approval in March 2024. It covers approximately 12,000 public water systems. DuPont, Chemours, and Corteva collectively settled for $1.185 billion. Tyco Fire Products added $750 million. BASF contributed $316.5 million.
These water system settlements are separate from the personal injury AFFF lawsuit claims. Individual settlement amounts will depend on several factors. Diagnosis type matters significantly. Kidney cancer claims are classified as Tier 1 with the strongest evidence. The severity and stage of illness affect potential compensation. Length and intensity of exposure are also considered. Attorneys project that settlement values will vary widely based on individual circumstances. You should consult a licensed attorney for a realistic assessment of your claim’s potential value.
As a result of ongoing settlement framework discussions, many legal experts expect a global personal injury resolution in 2026 or 2027. The appointment of a special master is a strong signal. Bellwether trials, once scheduled, will also create pressure for settlement. Each AFFF lawsuit resolved through trial provides data points that shape future negotiations. The litigation is clearly moving toward resolution, but patience is required.
State-by-State Considerations
State laws significantly affect how an AFFF lawsuit proceeds. Each state has its own statute of limitations and tort reform rules. Some states cap non-economic damages. Others have modified joint and several liability rules. These differences can change the value and strategy of your claim. For example, New Jersey has been the most active state. It secured an $875 million settlement from Chemours, DuPont, and Corteva in August 2025 for environmental contamination claims.
Florida, California, and Washington also have significant plaintiff populations in the AFFF lawsuit. Connecticut filed a separate state-level complaint naming 3M and other defendants. States with large military installations tend to have higher case counts. You can learn more about how your state’s laws affect mass tort claims on our state-by-state tort reform guide. Understanding your state’s legal landscape is an important part of building a strong claim.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is it too late to file an AFFF lawsuit in 2026?
For many people, it is not too late. The discovery rule in most states means the statute of limitations starts when you learned your condition was linked to AFFF. However, deadlines vary by state and specific circumstances. Contact an attorney promptly to evaluate your filing window.
Do I need to prove I used AFFF directly to qualify?
Not necessarily. Many claimants were exposed through contaminated drinking water rather than direct contact with the foam. If you lived or worked near a military base, airport, or fire training facility that used AFFF, you might be eligible. A lawyer can help determine whether your exposure history meets the requirements.
How long will the AFFF lawsuit take to resolve?
Mass tort litigation typically takes several years. The water system settlements are already approved and paying out. Personal injury claims are still in active litigation. Legal experts anticipate a global settlement framework could emerge in 2026 or 2027. Individual timelines depend on case complexity, but filing sooner gives your attorney more time to build a strong claim.
Check If You May Qualify
Mass tort eligibility depends on your specific exposure, injuries, and the state where you live. A licensed mass tort attorney can evaluate your situation at no upfront cost — most work on contingency, meaning you pay nothing unless you recover compensation.
Official Sources & Resources
For verified mass tort and MDL information:
- JPML: jpml.uscourts.gov — official MDL statistics and transfer orders
- DOJ: justice.gov — settlement announcements and press releases
- FDA: fda.gov — drug recalls, warning letters, and safety alerts
- CDC: cdc.gov — health condition data and exposure guidelines
- EPA: epa.gov — environmental contamination data
- Cornell LII: law.cornell.edu — plain-English legal definitions
Content last reviewed May 2026. This is general educational information, not legal advice. If you notice outdated information, please contact us.
Related Guides
- All Active MDL Cases
- More in This Category
- Tort Reform by State — 50-State Comparison
- All 50 State Tort Reform Guides
- Mass Tort Explainers
- Demographic Guides
- Mass Tort Tips
- Texas Tort Reform Guide
- Florida Tort Reform Guide
- Georgia Tort Reform Guide
Attorney Advertising. The information on this page is provided for general informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is created by accessing or using this content. Every case is unique, and results depend on the specific facts and circumstances involved. Past settlement amounts and case outcomes do not guarantee similar results in your case. If you believe you have a legal claim, you should consult with a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction who can evaluate your specific situation.