Angiodynamics port catheter lawsuit claims continue to grow in 2026. Hundreds of patients allege that defective port catheters caused serious injuries. These implantable devices deliver chemotherapy and other medications directly into the bloodstream. However, lawsuits claim that excessive barium sulfate in the catheter tubing led to fractures, infections, and dangerous complications. The federal litigation is now consolidated in the Southern District of California. If you or a loved one suffered complications from an AngioDynamics port catheter, you may qualify to seek compensation.
Case Timeline
Last checked: September 03, 2026
What Is the AngioDynamics Port Catheter Lawsuit About?
Port catheters are small medical devices implanted under the skin. They provide long-term venous access for chemotherapy, antibiotics, and blood draws. AngioDynamics manufactured several popular models. These include the SmartPort, Vortex Port, BioFlo, and Xcela Plus. Navilyst Medical, a subsidiary, also produced the PowerPort device.
The core allegation in the angiodynamics port catheter lawsuit is a design defect. Barium sulfate is added to catheter tubing to make it visible on X-rays. However, plaintiffs claim AngioDynamics used excessive amounts of this compound. As a result, the polyurethane tubing becomes brittle and prone to cracking. Micro-fractures can allow bacteria to enter the bloodstream. Broken catheter fragments can migrate to the heart or lungs.
Reported injuries include catheter fracture and fragment migration. Patients have suffered bloodstream infections, sepsis, and deep vein thrombosis. Some required emergency surgery to remove catheter fragments from the heart. In the most severe cases, these complications have resulted in wrongful death. The FDA issued a Class I recall of certain SmartPort kits in February 2021. A second recall of the Vortex MP Port followed in September 2022.
MDL Case Status and Key Facts
| MDL Detail | Current Data |
|---|---|
| MDL Number | MDL-3125 |
| Pending Cases | 401 |
| Presiding Judge | Jinsook Ohta |
| Federal District | CAS |
| Data Source | U.S. Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation |
| Last Updated | August 03, 2026 |
| Detail | Information |
|---|---|
| MDL Number | 3125 |
| Full Case Name | In Re: AngioDynamics, Inc., and Navilyst Medical, Inc., Port Catheter Products Liability Litigation |
| Presiding Judge | Judge Jinsook Ohta |
| Federal District | Southern District of California |
| Approximate Case Count | 300+ |
| MDL Created | October 2024 |
| Bellwether Pool Selection | August 2026 |
| First Bellwether Trial (Est.) | Mid-2028 |
The U.S. Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation created MDL-3125 in October 2024. All federal angiodynamics port catheter lawsuit cases were transferred to San Diego. Judge Jinsook Ohta oversees all coordinated pretrial proceedings. As of early 2026, more than 300 cases are pending in the MDL. New lawsuits continue to be filed directly into the consolidated proceeding.
The bellwether selection process is now underway. Each side will choose nine cases for an initial pool of 18. These selections are due by August 2026. Four cases from each side must involve infection claims. Two must involve thrombosis injuries, and two must involve catheter fracture. By February 2027, the pool will narrow to 10 cases. The first bellwether trials are expected to begin in mid-2028.
Who Qualifies for the AngioDynamics Port Catheter Lawsuit?
You may qualify for the angiodynamics port catheter lawsuit if you received an AngioDynamics port device and experienced complications. Qualifying devices include the SmartPort, Vortex Port, BioFlo, Xcela Plus, and Navilyst PowerPort. In most cases, patients who suffered injuries after implantation may be eligible to file a claim.
Common qualifying injuries include catheter fracture or fragmentation. Bloodstream infections and sepsis also qualify. Deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, and cardiac complications are frequently cited. Patients who required surgical removal of a fractured catheter may have strong claims. Family members of patients who died from complications might be eligible for wrongful death claims.
To pursue an angiodynamics port catheter lawsuit claim, you will need medical records. These should document the type of port implanted and the injuries you experienced. Evidence that the device malfunctioned strengthens a claim. Typically, you must file within your state’s statute of limitations. This ranges from one to three years from injury discovery in most states. Consulting a licensed attorney early is strongly recommended.
How to File an AngioDynamics Port Catheter Lawsuit Claim
The first step is to consult with an experienced mass tort attorney. Many law firms offer free case evaluations for port catheter claims. An attorney can review your medical records and determine if you have a viable case. For example, they will assess whether your specific device and injuries meet the criteria for MDL-3125.
If your case qualifies, your attorney will file the lawsuit in federal court. New angiodynamics port catheter lawsuit cases can now be filed directly into the MDL in San Diego. Your lawyer will complete a plaintiff fact sheet. This detailed document outlines your medical history, device information, and injuries. It is a critical part of the discovery process in multidistrict litigation.
Statute of limitations deadlines vary by state. In most cases, the clock starts when you discover the injury. However, some states apply different rules for medical device claims. An attorney familiar with the angiodynamics port catheter lawsuit can help you understand your state’s requirements. Do not delay in seeking legal advice. Missing a filing deadline could permanently bar your claim.
📨 Get Free Mass Tort Guides Alerts
Free · No spam · Unsubscribe anytime
Settlement Updates and What to Expect
As of May 2026, no global settlement has been announced in MDL-3125. The litigation is still in its early stages. Bellwether case selection is currently underway. These test trials will help both sides evaluate the strength of claims. Settlement negotiations typically begin after bellwether trial results are known.
The timeline for resolution in the angiodynamics port catheter lawsuit will likely extend into 2028 and beyond. First bellwether trials are not expected until mid-2028. However, individual settlements can sometimes occur before trial. The value of each case depends on several factors. Injury severity, medical expenses, and strength of evidence all play a role.
Settlement amounts in mass tort cases vary widely. Cases involving wrongful death or emergency surgery typically command higher values. Claims involving infection alone may settle for different amounts. As a result, it is impossible to predict exact figures at this stage. Patients should work closely with their legal team to understand what their individual case may be worth.
State-by-State Considerations
Although the angiodynamics port catheter lawsuit is consolidated in federal court in California, state laws still matter. Each plaintiff’s claims are governed by the tort laws of their home state. This affects statutes of limitations, damage caps, and available theories of liability. For example, some states cap non-economic damages in product liability cases.
States with notable plaintiff counts in port catheter litigation include California, Texas, Florida, New York, and Pennsylvania. Tort reform laws in Texas and Florida may limit certain damage awards. However, states like California and New York generally allow broader recovery. Plaintiffs should review state-specific tort reform guides to understand how local laws affect their case.
Frequently Asked Questions
What AngioDynamics port catheter models are included in the lawsuit?
The angiodynamics port catheter lawsuit includes the SmartPort, Vortex Port, BioFlo, Xcela Plus, and Navilyst PowerPort. All of these devices are alleged to contain excessive barium sulfate. This manufacturing defect may cause the catheter to fracture or degrade, leading to serious medical complications.
How long will the AngioDynamics port catheter MDL take to resolve?
MDL-3125 is still in early stages as of 2026. Bellwether trials are expected to begin in mid-2028. A global settlement, if reached, could follow after initial trial results. However, mass tort litigation often takes several years from start to finish.
Can I still file an angiodynamics port catheter lawsuit in 2026?
Yes, new cases are still being accepted into MDL-3125. However, you must file within your state’s statute of limitations. This is typically two to three years from when you discovered the injury. Contact a licensed attorney as soon as possible to protect your rights.
Check If You May Qualify
Mass tort eligibility depends on your specific exposure, injuries, and the state where you live. A licensed mass tort attorney can evaluate your situation at no upfront cost — most work on contingency, meaning you pay nothing unless you recover compensation.
Official Sources & Resources
For verified mass tort and MDL information:
- U.S. Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation (JPML)
- U.S. Department of Justice
- FDA Safety Alerts & Recalls
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
- U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Content last reviewed May 2026. This is general educational information, not legal advice. If you notice outdated information, please contact us.
Related Guides
- All Active MDL Cases
- More in This Category
- Tort Reform by State — 50-State Comparison
- All 50 State Tort Reform Guides
- Mass Tort Explainers
- Demographic Guides
- Mass Tort Tips
- Ohio Tort Reform Guide
- Georgia Tort Reform Guide
- New York Tort Reform Guide
Attorney Advertising. The information on this page is provided for general informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is created by accessing or using this content. Every case is unique, and results depend on the specific facts and circumstances involved. Past settlement amounts and case outcomes do not guarantee similar results in your case. If you believe you have a legal claim, you should consult with a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction who can evaluate your specific situation.